by Sara Hawkins
I met Sara on Google+, where I seem to be spending more and more time lately. When I realized that she was both an attorney and someone who understands the world of bloggers, online publishers, and authors, I asked her to write an article that would highlight legal issues authors face, and how those issues affect self-publishers. Here’s her response.
As an author, you probably don’t often consider many legal issues about writing your book. Sure, there’s the contract with the publisher, designer, or copyeditor. Traditionally, for most authors there just weren’t many legalities to consider. That was until traditional book authorship and publishing met the internet and created their lovechild called self-publishing.
We all know the publishing industry has changed. One of the biggest changes is that unless you’re an A-list author you’re responsible for much more in the writing, editing, promoting, as well as publishing process than in the past.
Fewer people shepherding a book in the traditional publishing industry means authors no longer have legions of experts to comb through their manuscript. One thing that can be counted on is that the publisher will have their legal department check your book out before it’s printed.
Not that authors are sued all the time, but when you take the route of self-publishing you also take on the liability that comes with the various legal issues. Most authors, though, aren’t lawyers. You’re experts in your own field or creative-types who spend countless hours developing characters and settings to create an authentic experience for the reader. Navigating the legal hurdles of publishing is now something authors must be concerned with.
Authors are likely aware of the basics of copyright when it comes to their book—they write the book, they own the copyright. But there are a few other key legal concerns that can greatly impact authors and self-publishers throughout the entire process, from conceiving the idea to all the subsequent updates, from pre-marketing to post-publication marketing. And while many authors may not initially see themselves as self-publishers, the changing landscape of the publishing world may eventually lead you down that road. Even if you do go the route of traditional publishing, you will likely still need to have a digital presence, which comes with a host of legal issues that you’ll want to know.
5 Top Legal Issues for Authors and Self-Publishers
1. Copyright of images and graphics
Basic copyright law says that if you create it then you own it. Yes, there are exceptions and nuances, but for the most part you can do whatever you wish with your own creations. However, as an author you may want to add graphics and images to enhance your story or your discussion and it’s easy to turn to the internet to find something you think would work perfectly.
Unfortunately there isn’t a clear-cut statement of whether an author can or can not use an image or graphic found online through a basic browser search. In typical lawyer form I say “maybe”. But that doesn’t help you much. No one wants to publish a book thinking they might get sued.
Today there are many resources where authors can find public domain images and graphics, but as with all things internet it’s up to the user to ensure that the work is indeed in the public domain and freely usable. That may be difficult if your source is a search engine, so using reliable sites can offer some peace of mind.
In addition to public domain images, creative commons licenses are another way to source images and graphics. But, again, you need to know what each of the licenses means and choose images that permit commercial use. If you can’t get permission and there is no Creative Commons or public domain work suitable for your needs, your next avenue is to determine if you can use another’s work under the Fair Use doctrine.
Fair Use is an exception to copyright infringement and allows a third party to use a copyrighted work under very specific circumstances. Unfortunately, there is no checklist or strict reading of this law, creating challenges for many authors. Since you may not have the counsel of a publisher, you’ll need to read up on this concept and determine if your use would fit the guidelines. Commercial works may have a claim of Fair Use, however as with all Fair Use claims it is a case-by-case determination.
2. Copyright of text and music lyrics
The discussion for copyright of text and music lyrics is similar to that of images and graphics, but they are not exactly parallel. With a graphic or image, you’re likely using the entire work, whereas with text or music lyrics you’re only using a portion. It is much more clear that using an entire text or reproducing the full music lyrics would violate copyright, the question now becomes how much can be used so that you’re not.
Traditional publishers may have guidelines, but they’re also willing to defend them if challenged. For self-published authors, being sued for using “too much” of a work may not be a risk worth taking.
Of course, there is still the ability to ask for a license before using the work if you are concerned with the legalities of using copyrighted material. There is, also, Fair Use. However, as was mentioned with regard to images and graphics, it’s not a clearly defined exception.
Unlike the discussion above, though, with text or music lyrics you’re likely only using a portion of the work so there is a stronger argument with regard to the quantity of the work used. Nonetheless, Fair Use goes beyond just a “word count” and you must be able to establish that your use does not interfere with the owner’s rights.
3. Registration of your copyright
While Joel has addressed what has to be on the copyright page of your book, some of you may wonder if you have to actually take that next step and register your copyright. This is one of the areas where most lawyers will agree that the small fee is definitely worth paying. While it’s not required, because copyright of your book exists without registration, to pursue most legal action the work must be registered.
4. Use of brand names and trademarks
In a fiction work, your characters are three-dimensional and may live in the same world we inhabit, with all of the brands and trademarks we’re familiar with. It makes sense that your heroine wears Prada or your leading man is sporting a Purple Label tux, but what do the brands think?
There are several legal theories in trademark that come in to play, “trademark infringement”, “trademark dilution” and “trademark tarnishment”. The most significant concerns for authors are with “dilution” and “tarnishment”. Xerox has been mounting a fight for decades to prevent all photocopying from being referred to as “xeroxing”, as has Kimberly-Clark been concerned with all facial tissues being generically referred to as “Kleenex”.
More recently, Google has brought in their legal team to prevent their trademark from becoming an equivalent to the default word for searching the internet. Using a trademark, whether registered or not, to describe a product or service generically can draw attention to your work and create potential liability. Brand names should be reserved for describing that particular product or service offered by the company.
When it comes to using a brand name in a negative light, authors walk a very fine line. Brand “tarnishment” is akin to defamation, and disparaging use of a brand name is often easier to find as publishing moves to the ebook and audiobook formats. Unless there is a compelling artistic reason to disparage a brand, creating a fictional brand would be prudent. If, however, you feel your story would be compromised without using the actual brand name, seek counsel to evaluate the risks and determine how best to minimize them.
5. What if it’s your work that’s taken?
Without a big publisher behind you, policing your copyright adds to your post-publication duties. If you’ve taken the steps to register your work, enforcing your copyright through the court system is a little easier. Often the difficulty comes in identifying that your work has been copied, but with a well-established community it’s likely one of your readers or supporters will spot the infringement and bring it to your attention. Then what?
For many, the first step is to contact the author (and/or publisher) and tell them they’re violating your copyright. Depending on how much of your work has been taken; you may want to speak to an attorney to find out the best way to approach the author and/or publisher of the allegedly infringing work. If your work has not been registered yet, and the alleged infringement is significant, registering your work should be done immediately.
One of the benefits of online booksellers is you can avail yourself of the DMCA takedown process, which does not require that your work be registered, if you have a good faith belief your work is being infringed. The reporting process is often incorporated into larger bookseller websites, making it easy to report violation and have the allegedly offending book taken down.
Unfortunately, this DMCA takedown process must be repeated for every site promoting the sale or distribution of the allegedly infringing book. In addition, there is the confrontation factor when you have to notify the person whose work you allege is infringing.
In addition to the DMCA takedown process you may likely need to work with the traditional route of copyright infringement notification. Speaking with a Copyright enforcement attorney may be necessary, although you may be able to resolve the matter without escalating it and involving an attorney.
Regardless of whether the book is a physical or electronic publication, it is a multi-step process to getting the book taken down from sale sites, notifying a publisher, contacting the author, and submitting a takedown request to a hosting company if an author is hawking the book on their site.
Conclusion
Part of learning is making mistakes. Unfortunately, with self-publishing mistakes the consequences can be quite harsh. Few people set out to purposely infringe another’s work. But it happens. Authors are not often versed in the nuances of copyright law and may unwittingly find themselves on the wrong end of a copyright infringement conversation.
As authors look to extend their reach beyond a single book, a single act of copyright infringement can be a turn-off to a traditional publisher, movie agent, movie studio, or speaker’s bureau. A self-published author’s credibility is tied into more than just the words of their book.
Whereas an author who is working with a traditional publisher may have multiple checks along the way, self-publishing requires you to wear many more hats. No one is expecting you to become a lawyer along this path. However, understanding just a few legal topics means making more informed choices, avoiding potential liability, and being able to act quickly to protect your rights.
Disclosure: This article and any associated comments are for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. Photo: bigstockphoto.com
Sara Hawkins is the creator of a Blog Law series, which aims to help bloggers, entrepreneurs, and online professionals gain legal confidence. Sara is a licensed attorney providing counsel to entrepreneurs and online professionals. She can be found on Twitter at @Saving4Someday.

















{ 33 comments… read them below or add one }
“I can’t do no literary work for the rest of this year because I’m meditating another lawsuit and looking around for a defendant.”
— Mark Twain
Ernie, I’m always amazed at how pertinent Mark Twain’s musings are all these years later.
Thanks for reading,
Sara
Thanks for the article.
Quick question:
If I uses a short poem by e e cummings, where/who would I contact to receive permission to use the poem?
Thanks in advance
Athena,
Thank you for reading and commenting.
From a quick search, I found that Liveright Publishing may manage the e.e. cummings copyright trust. Here’s a link – http://books.wwnorton.com/books/affiliatecontent.aspx?id=24633.
~ Sara
thank you :-)
Thank you for Another timely post for me. In my current WIP, there’s a scene where the Beatles, Eight Days a Week comes into play. I’ve wondered just how much of the lyric I can safely include, and whether it would be better to just reference the title, assuming most readers will know the song and understand the relevance…um!
Carol, glad to know the article was timely for you. Sony/ATV (a joint venture between Sony and the late Michael Jackson) own most of the rights to music from the Beetles. They do license and from their site you can submit requests to: info@sonyatv.com
~ Sara
Thank you Sara, that’s above and beyond :) I appreciate your help. carol
Great article, Joel. Thank you for the information from Sara Hawkins.
You’re welcome, Patrick.
Here is the FAQ’s page for registering for a copyright…
http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-register.html
Regarding Fair Use, here is a quote from the US Copyright Office and a link to the full page text…
The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use: “quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations; use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report; reproduction by a library of a portion of a work to replace part of a damaged copy; reproduction by a teacher or student of a small part of a work to illustrate a lesson; reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports; incidental and fortuitous reproduction, in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work located in the scene of an event being reported.”
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html
I would also like to point readers to David Amkraut’s article on fair use and the many comments below that help to clarify how fair use plays out in actual conditions: What Every Writer Ought to Know about Fair Use and Copyright
Useful trivia….the TV series WKRP in Cincinnati, a tv show about a rock radio station, originally used all popular music (Elton John, Dan Fogelberg, Hendrix, etc.) in scenes in which the music was part of the atmosphere. For example, when Johnny Fever would put the needle on the record and you’d hear a song by The Eagles. In later years, due to the huge cost of re-licensing the music, the re-runs had generic music in place of the original.
Joel, thank you for adding David’s article. Just another reason why your site it so valuable to authors. ~ Sara
Great post Sara. The issue of brands and trademarks is certainly something that I wonder about going forward on my project. While I’d prefer to be generic, the nature of what I’m writing makes it very hard to not use brand names.
Thank you for reading and commenting, Christi. Trademark laws are a bit more complex and there are some brands that are a bit, shall we say, overzealous in policing their marks. There is a “fair use” aspect of trademark law but it’s even more nebulous than that of copyright law, making it harder to navigate. But still, there are possibilities. ~ Sara
Great, and timely, information. I’m always worried about using brand names. I usually try to work around them but sometimes it’s necessary. Thanks, Sara.
Thank you, V, for reading and commenting. Using a brand name can often do in a few words would would likely take dozens and then still not do the scenario justice. Imagine the title if Weisberger couldn’t use Prada – The Devil Wears Very Fancy Shoes just doesn’t have the same ring to it. Fortunately, owning the trademark for a word or phrase doesn’t mean it’s taken out of the language for others to use. ~ Sara
Thanks Joel and Sara. Very timely and helpful.
Truly my pleasure, Katy. Glad it had information you could use. ~ Sara
Best to avoid lyrics, even just a few words. You can, however, use song titles because they (like book and film titles) cannot be copyrighted. I know of several authors who’ve gotten into trouble by using song lyrics in their books without permission, and permission from most popular singers/bands is prohibitively expensive.
Great intro to IP law for authors Sara. Like several other commenters, using brand names is one of my bigger concerns. I try to stay generic. That’s because I don’t consider most uses to be worth the legal risk. And as a reader I’ve found fake brand names to be distracting, especially when it’s obvious the author is hinting at a real brand.
Jenn, thank you for your comment. I, too, have found the use of fake brands to be distracting but I understand the reason why they had to do it. It’s a delicate tug-of-war between trademark holders and authors trying to create a sense of authenticity and realism. ~ Sara
I don’t give a damn if someone tries to steal my work they’re going to have to answer to me and it’s not going to be pleasant. I don’t give a damn I will put the fear of GOD in them.
Wow, didn’t know that about Google! I use it as a ‘verb’ all the time. I thought I was ‘promoting’ or suggesting that readers use Google for their search but re-reading some of the passages, it could easily be misconstrued as a generalism using Google to mean ‘search’.
Interesting! But I don’t suppose Google will come knocking on my little door to complain :-)
What is rarely mentioned is the cost to fight a copyright infringement claim. Most self-published authors don’t have $10,000 to spend to get a court resolution. So yes a copyright is great but if it ever comes down to a legal dispute you have to make the decision on whether or not your self-published book is work that type of investment that you may never recoup. Just the sad fact of the world we live in, a crook and conman can get away with piracy and stealing your work because the justice system is not cheap.
Michelle, you’re absolutely right. The cost to pursue legal action is one of the reasons why so many authors end up taking their case to the court of public opinion. It’s a very unfortunate aspect of our legal system, and many people prey on our inability fight.
In those instances where the infringement is online, authors do often use the DMCA to at least get their work down.
Thanks for bringing this up.
~ Sara
Sara,
I’m sure you get bombarded with legal questions all the time, but I hope you have time to answer this one. Outside of a copyright, what can an author do to protect themselves from faulty claims of infringement. I’m particularly concerned with releasing new manuscripts after a previous incident. Are there are certain documents outside of copyright that can help prove you own the works so even if a faulty claim is raised you can defend yourself without legal help?
Truly,
Michelle
Sara,
I’m sure you get bombarded with legal questions all the time, but I hope you have time to answer this one. Outside of a copyright, what can an author do to protect themselves from faulty claims of infringement. I’m particularly concerned with releasing new manuscripts after a previous incident. Are there certain documents outside of copyright that can help prove you own the works so even if a faulty claim is raised you can defend yourself without legal help?
Truly,
Michelle
Michelle,
This is an excellent question. Unfortunately, there is nothing to stop anyone from making a faulty claim of copyright infringement. Obviously, when filing a lawsuit there is a sworn statement that the information is correct and truthful but one person’s idea of correct and truthful may not, in fact, be correct or true.
In cases where there is no basis, the case will likely be dismissed. But that does not account for the time and money to defend yourself.
I wish there was a more concrete answer, but, in fact, there isn’t.
~ Sara
Hello,
Not sure if I am sure if my question fits here but here goes.
I have a book out of copy write over 80 years ago, I wish to republish. I will update it and move images around, remove some text, so minor changes, maybe change the title and can I put my name on the book as mine? I suppose my question is if you republish a book out of copy write, can I change the title? Also not include the original authors name?
Roger, unfortunately there isn’t one clear answer because there are number of different hurdles that need to be cleared before saying “yes” to republishing a work that appears to be in the public domain. The underlying Public Domain work will continue to be in the public domain, and depending on what is added the additions may be sufficient to obtain their own copyright. However, age alone is not a clear indicator of a work being in the public domain. If there is not absolute certainty, a clearance expert should be employed to ensure the work is in the public domain.
With regard to not including the original author’s name, legally there is precedent that it does not need to be included. (Dastar Corp. v. 20th Century Fox Film Corp., 123 S.Ct. 2041 (2003).) However, copyright laws and plagiarism ethics may be in conflict.
The title of a work is not usually subject to copyright. But again, there could be exceptions.
{ 5 trackbacks }