<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Self-Publishing Basics: 5 Layout Mistakes that Make You Look Unprofessional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebookdesigner.com/2009/09/5-layout-mistakesr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebookdesigner.com/2009/09/5-layout-mistakesr/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=5-layout-mistakesr</link>
	<description>Practical Advice to Help Self-Publishers Build Better Books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Conway</title>
		<link>http://www.thebookdesigner.com/2009/09/5-layout-mistakesr/#comment-19002</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Conway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebookdesigner.com/?p=16#comment-19002</guid>
		<description>Using a tab or em space in the opening paragraph of a chapter is the one that really grinds my gears.

I discovered this typesetting feature while poring over books as a teenager and cannot understand why people much older seem to have never noticed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a tab or em space in the opening paragraph of a chapter is the one that really grinds my gears.</p>
<p>I discovered this typesetting feature while poring over books as a teenager and cannot understand why people much older seem to have never noticed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixie Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.thebookdesigner.com/2009/09/5-layout-mistakesr/#comment-18268</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixie Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebookdesigner.com/?p=16#comment-18268</guid>
		<description>I assume the directives about odd/even, blank, and left/right page layouts apply only to printed books. Are there similar or different considerations for e-books in how page numbering or part opening pages should be handled?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume the directives about odd/even, blank, and left/right page layouts apply only to printed books. Are there similar or different considerations for e-books in how page numbering or part opening pages should be handled?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrystine Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.thebookdesigner.com/2009/09/5-layout-mistakesr/#comment-16166</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrystine Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebookdesigner.com/?p=16#comment-16166</guid>
		<description>The way many people use full justify is one of my pet peeves. Too often they click the full justify button in a book or document and feel they have done a good job. The problem is that most word processing programs only adjust spaces between the words, which often results in large white space gaps in the text. I find that distracting and difficult to follow. It reminds me of something done with refrigerator word magnets.

Maybe it is because I am old enough to remember doing this on a typewriter, but my preferred option is to pretend that I do not have a full justify button. I know it is time consuming, but I feel it is worth the effort to adjust the font spacing, condensing or expanding to fill each line and wrap words into a line to fill the space. While many paragraphs will look “okay” by just clicking the full justify button, they look better if you adjust the character setting first, and I feel it is a must for text with the large white gaps.  Once that has been done, clicking on the full justify button results in a near perfect look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way many people use full justify is one of my pet peeves. Too often they click the full justify button in a book or document and feel they have done a good job. The problem is that most word processing programs only adjust spaces between the words, which often results in large white space gaps in the text. I find that distracting and difficult to follow. It reminds me of something done with refrigerator word magnets.</p>
<p>Maybe it is because I am old enough to remember doing this on a typewriter, but my preferred option is to pretend that I do not have a full justify button. I know it is time consuming, but I feel it is worth the effort to adjust the font spacing, condensing or expanding to fill each line and wrap words into a line to fill the space. While many paragraphs will look “okay” by just clicking the full justify button, they look better if you adjust the character setting first, and I feel it is a must for text with the large white gaps.  Once that has been done, clicking on the full justify button results in a near perfect look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

